US news on Tucson VA wait times validates whistleblower’s claims

After 17 years operative as a purebred helper in a Tucson VA system, Diane Suter says she was taken aback when a manager initial pressured her to secretly record studious wait times in 2014.

Suter, 62, had customarily started a new pursuit scheduling patients during a Southern Arizona VA Health Care System primary caring sanatorium on South Sixth Avenue. Wait times were mostly one to 3 months long, though divulgence a loyal wait times in a mechanism complement meant a alloy missed out on reward pay, Suter’s helper manager told her.

“She said, ‘Your appointments are over dual weeks out and you’re costing your alloy money,’” Suter said. The manager showed her how to “zero out” wait times on their computerized scheduling system: Suter was told to submit a patient’s preferred appointment date as a same day as a scheduled appointment date, so it would seem there was no wait time, she said.

Suter complied after her manager strongly pragmatic she’d be discharged if she refused. But her stubborn whistleblower complaints to VA regulators and legislators contributed to a Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General’s preference to examine a Tucson VA starting in April.

The ensuing Office of Inspector General news substantiated most of what Suter purported about wait-time strategy and bungle during a Southern Arizona VA Health Care System.

The report, expelled Nov. 9, endorsed disciplinary movement for staff who speedy a falsifications. The news found:


  • Between Dec 2013 and Aug 2014, 76 percent of appointments in a Ocotillo Primary Care Clinic – where Suter worked – had a zero-day wait time.
  • t

  • In mercantile year 2013, Ocotillo sanatorium physicians got bonuses formed in partial on a commission of patients with appointments scheduled within 14 days of their requested date. Doctor compensate did not seem to be formed on wait times in a following 3 mercantile years.
  • t

  • Training materials from 2014 suggested staff workers to symbol a patient’s preferred appointment date as a same as a tangible appointment date in some scenarios, in defilement of VA policy. Some time after a fallout from a Phoenix VA wait-time liaison in mid-2014, a training materials were updated to align with VA scheduling policy.

Tucson VA orator Luke Johnson pronounced in an email a practices described in a news “are inapt and are not unchanging with a … core values of integrity, commitment, advocacy, honour and excellence.”

The OIG also expelled a apart news on Nov. 8 summarizing allegations about a Tucson VA dating to 2012, and successive investigations. Among a report’s conclusions: Tucson’s VA staff kept 400 orthopedic and 600 urologic appointment requests on pieces of paper, instead of in a electronic scheduling system.

A staff member who told comparison leaders about these practices pronounced that her concerns were dismissed, a news said.

Johnson pronounced a VA apologizes to veterans for these practices, that are no longer occurring.

“These reports are associated to practices dating as distant behind as 2008, and we have done poignant changes given then,” he said.

An OIG news found 1,700 patients during a Phoenix VA sanatorium were put on unaccepted watchful lists. Veterans there waited an normal of 115 days for their initial appointment, though a trickery reported an normal wait time of 24 days, that could have led to bonuses for Phoenix VA leadership, a news said.

Doctors’ and nurses’ opening compensate is no longer tied to wait times, Johnson said.

Even before a new OIG news was released, a Southern Arizona VA Health Care System reviewed scheduling practices and has lerned staff to be in correspondence with sovereign VA procedures. Johnson encourages VA staff to pronounce adult if reprobate practices are still happening.

“If there are any scheduling issues or concerns, caring wants to know about them so they can be addressed,” he said.

An underlying systemic problem is medicine staffing issues during VA hospitals, including problem recruiting specialists, Johnson said. In a past integrate of years, a Southern Arizona VA Health Care System has hired 100 new staff members and is reviewing medicine remuneration to urge recruitment and retention, he said.

“These initiatives have helped raise entrance to caring for a veterans,” he said.

Johnson pronounced that in September, wait times for primary caring appointments during a Tucson VA averaged reduction than 4 days; specialty caring wait times were about 6 days; and mental health appointments were reduction than 3 days.

Vietnam War maestro Ray Murphy, 67, pronounced Friday he was “a small shocked” by a news of a wait-time rascal during Tucson’s VA. He’s had customarily certain practice there removing diagnosis for conference problems, and his wait times are customarily reduction than 30 days, he said. But Murphy pronounced he has a integrate of friends who have gifted unequivocally prolonged wait times to see specialists.

“I consider privately that a Tucson VA is unequivocally good,” pronounced Murphy, who served 3 tours in Vietnam as a member of a U.S. Navy and still deals with a effects of bearing to Agent Orange. But for veterans in need of timely obligatory care, he said, “if they’re not removing it, that’s not good.”

Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, D-Ariz., pronounced in a Friday email that she asked a OIG to examine a Tucson VA after conference from Suter. In a statement, she called a formula of a OIG news “infuriating and unacceptable.”

“I don’t see how a VA can acquire behind a trust of a veterans until these systemic problems are bound once and for all,” she said.

After Suter objected to reprobate scheduling practices, she suffered plea and a antagonistic work environment, heading her to leave a VA in Aug 2014 and find diagnosis for post-traumatic highlight disorder, she said.

The helper manager who compelled her to reproduce wait times still works during a Tucson VA, Suter said.

Johnson pronounced a Southern Arizona VA Health Care System has allocated an “administrative inquisitive board” to examination a practices identified in a OIG report.

“The range and turn of required crew actions will be dynamic formed on a commentary of this board,” he said.

Contact contributor Emily Bregel during

or 573-4233.

What's Your Reaction?
Cute Cute
Buzz Buzz
Geeky Geeky
Win Win
Angry Angry
Fail Fail
Love Love

log in

reset password

Back to
log in